Ports completely and permanently hosed
Gary Kline
kline at thought.org
Fri Aug 7 05:53:30 UTC 2009
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 08:17:20AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06 August 2009 pm 19:10:07 Lars Eighner wrote:
> >
> > Would these things build if I deleted all 1619 installed
> > packages and started from scratch, or are the circular gotchas
> > built-in with python and qt?
>
> do not even ask this question if you have a working system.
>
> I realised this problem by luck when I tried to update a single
> program which is affected by this. After seeing how many ports
> depend on this, I decided to keep my system as it is and wait
> until FreeBSD 8 is officially out.
>
> I will then do a full upgrade.
>
> I think that you hit the weakest point of FreeBSD. When a version
> number of a base port changes, hundreds or even thousands of
> ports have to be recompiled. It is basically the same effect as
> when the major version number of FreeBSD changes.
>
> If this would be synchronised with the main FreeBSD releases, it
> would have a minor effect on users.
>
> Erich
AFAIC, Erich's words could be printed in gold. Or cast in gold and hung
above every FBSD installation. If just this stuff--keeping current--
were made push-button, man, that would make my year. Or century.
(*****)
gary
--
Gary Kline kline at thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org
The 5.67a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list