ports/*/jpeg "Thanks a lot guys"

[RW]

On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 10:10:17 +0100
Matthew Seaman <m.seaman at infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:

> The OP does have a valid point though.  I just got an e-mail from
> Freshports saying that a bunch of ports I maintain had had
> PORTREVISION bumps because of the jpeg update.  Which is all fine and
> dandy, except that these were the www/p5-RT-* extension modules for
> RT. 
> ...

Actually, I think his point was that the ports were bumped too long
after the jpeg update, when people had already done the recursive
upgrade.