OPTIONS handling doesn't seem to work fully in dependencies anymore

[Alex Dupre]

John Baldwin wrote:
> Ahh, I think I see now.  It requires one OPTIONS using port to mask the 
> dependencies.

Exactly.

>> I thought the same thing, probably yes, but I dunno why it was added in 
>> such way from the beginning, so I tried to create the simplest and 
>> surely working patch maintaining the current workflow.
> 
> Ok.

Probably it was added in such way because at the beginning there wasn't 
the config-conditional target and runing the config target for every 
port (re)build was not a bright idea. If I have time I'll try to make a 
patch following this rationale, but in the meanwhile my previous patch 
seems good enough.

--
Alex Dupre