How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS (was: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error)

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
Martin Cracauer <cracauer at cons.org> wrote:

> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:57:17PM +0200: 
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500
> > Martin Cracauer <cracauer at cons.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
> > 
> >  [ .. ]
> > 
> > > QAT at freebsd.org wrote on Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:52:57AM +0200: 
> > > > Hi,
> > 
> > BTW, you got the same error in two other BotMails (at least):
> > 
> > From: QAT at FreeBSD.org
> > To: cracauer at cons.org
> > Subject: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error
> > Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:45:17 +0300 (EEST)
> > 
> > From: QAT at FreeBSD.org
> > To: cracauer at cons.org
> > Subject: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error
> > Date: Wed,  3 Sep 2008 07:06:07 +0300 (EEST)
> > 
> > Did you received those emails ?
> 
> I thought somebody else messed with my port and waited for him/her to
> fix it :-)  Sorry.

My QAT Cc's the maintainer on commit-triggered BotMails. And sends mail
only to maintainer for QA-triggered or dependency-triggered BotMails.

Anyway, waiting some months for someone to fix your port might be a
little to much ;-)

More about the way QAT works here:
http://t32.tecnik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/

> Which is kind of true, I didn't put these lines into pkg-plist.  But
> it seems to have been a multi-port sweep.

Might be, I didn't check.


-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu at FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20081118/c93b08d3/signature.pgp