Problems with portupgrade && xscreensaver-gnome

[Robert Noland]

On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 22:17 +0000, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:45:10 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> 
> > In response to Marcin Wisnicki <mwisnicki+freebsd at gmail.com>:
> > 
> >> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> >> 
> >> > cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a FreeBSD
> >> > vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD
> >> > 7.0-RELEASE #4: Wed Jun 25 09:16:13 EDT 2008
> >> > root at vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com:/usr/obj/usr/
> src/
> >> sys/VANQUISH
> >> >  i386 # pkg_info | grep portupgrade
> >> > portupgrade-2.4.6,2 FreeBSD ports/packages administration and
> >> > management tool s # portupgrade -a
> >> > [...]
> >> > ** Makefile possibly broken: x11/xscreensaver-gnome:
> >> > 	"Makefile", line 106: warning: Option KEYRING needs PAM, but PAM
> >> is
> >> > 	disabled. xscreensaver-gnome-5.06_1
> >> 
> >> You need to either enable PAM (recommended) or disable KEYRING by
> >> doing:
> >>  cd /usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver-gnome/; make config
> > 
> > Are you saying that I can't portupgrade ANY ports on my system until
> > such time as I make this strange decision?
> 
> Why do you think it is a strange decision?
> You have set non-default options that don't make sense and the port is 
> warning you about that. Fixing it is quick, easy and painless.

Just force the depend on PAM if KEYRING is on..  You can look at how I
did some of that in the compiz port.  It doesn't matter what the PAM
option is set to, if KEYRING is selected you *MUST* have PAM.

robert.

> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"