How to post good follow-ups to bug-followup@ ?

[Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल]

Shaun Amott writes:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 06:46:27AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 07:13:04PM +0530, Ashish Shukla ???????????? ??????????????? wrote:
>> > ...
>> > > So either encoding them so they do get properly decoded, or ensuring
>> > > that they remain as-is (no MIME encoding or claims of same) should do
>> > > the trick.  I think I'd be more inclined toward the latter approach, if
>> > > possible.
>> > 
>> > You mean, no quoted-printable attachments, but using 7bit
>> > Content-Transfer-Encoding instead, hmm...?
>> 
>> I suspect that Fabian Keil's suggestion that the Web interface might
>> have trouble with signed messages may well be on the mark.
>> 

> Signed messages shouldn't be a problem in principle, but that message
> looks sufficiently dodgy to confuse the simplistic parser. The quoted
> printable header also isn't caught, so the attachment doesn't get
> decoded either.

I submitted the last followup to PR 123169[1] with unsigned mail, but
some lines in diff got wrapped. And if you tried to download diff from
the link, you won't get anything.

References:
[1] - http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=123169

Ashish
-- 
·-- ·- ···· ·--- ·- ···- ·- ·--·-· --· -- ·- ·· ·-·· ·-·-·- -·-· --- --
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20080720/7d79e2ec/attachment.pgp