How to post good follow-ups to bug-followup@ ?

[David Wolfskill]

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 07:13:04PM +0530, Ashish Shukla ???????????? ??????????????? wrote:
> ...
> > So either encoding them so they do get properly decoded, or ensuring
> > that they remain as-is (no MIME encoding or claims of same) should do
> > the trick.  I think I'd be more inclined toward the latter approach, if
> > possible.
> 
> You mean, no quoted-printable attachments, but using 7bit
> Content-Transfer-Encoding instead, hmm...?

I suspect that Fabian Keil's suggestion that the Web interface might
have trouble with signed messages may well be on the mark.

Peace,
david
-- 
David H. Wolfskill				david at catwhisker.org
I submit that "conspiracy" would be an appropriate collective noun for cats.

See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20080720/f260e3c0/attachment.pgp