ports/124985: [patch] devel/dmucs unbreak on 64bits archs

Mon Jul 7 17:04:31 UTC 2008

On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:34:54PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> I definitely do not agree. Please note that a pointer is not required to
> fit into a long, while it is required to fit into a size_t.
I do not think that C99 requires the size_t to be capable of holding
the pointer. size_t is only required to hold result of sizeof.

It is intptr_t type that shall do it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20080707/986b16e6/attachment.pgp