Reviving a dead port

[Philip M. Gollucci]

> Second, the port version I wrote is anachronic, since some people may
> have 1.46 installed (or prior 1.45.5 version, but PORT_REVISION can be
> used here so this is not an issue). What's the correct way (or least
> annoyance way) to handle this backtime travel?
See PORTEPOCH

Also, PORT_REVISION is PORTREVISION

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#MAKEFILE-NAMING-REVEPOCH

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci (philip at riderway.com) 323.219.4708
Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com
1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB  B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.