Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?
Alexander Leidinger
Alexander at Leidinger.net
Thu May 17 15:53:06 UTC 2007
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen at math.missouri.edu> (Thu, 17 May 2007 08:14:43 -0500):
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Alexander Leidinger <Alexander at Leidinger.net> (Thu, 17 May 2007 11:44:36 +0200):
> >
> >> For the difference between the redirected output case: I think the
> >> gnome terminal needs a lot of time to print all the lines. But still,
> >> the awk version takes around 3/4 of the time (interesting is the user
> >> time, not the total time). Stephen's version can be speed up some
> >> fractions by inserting a break into the first while-loop.
> >>
> >> Attached is my awk-version and the awk version which also includes the
> >> direct dependencies.
> >
> > After a little review: For the awk version the embedded "sort -u" can
> > be removed (it is done in the PKG_ARGS part), for Stephen's version it
> > is necessary to cut down processing time in the following part.
>
> Agreed
I played around a little bit with this, new version attached (simple
error handling in awk, doing just one awk for all files).
Comments please.
Stephen, if I don't get problem reports I will send-pr this as you
suggested.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
STANDARDS:
The principles we use to reject other people's code.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bsd.port.mk.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2063 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20070517/d1186b9c/bsd.port.mk.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list