Opinion on cross-port OPTIONS CONFLICTS
pav at FreeBSD.org
Fri Dec 21 16:29:33 PST 2007
Danny Pansters píše v so 22. 12. 2007 v 00:07 +0100:
> How about e.g. LIB_DEPENDS=artsdsp:/usr/portss/arts at WITHOUT_NAS to
> squash two
> flies at once.
> The idea being that if the port is not installed it yet, it could be built
> with make WITHOUT_NAS=1 automagically. Something like this is more pressing
> when you need to have a non-default option set in a port you depend on.
> However, you should be very careful to not decide things on the users behalf
> in a port. Consistancy, pola, all that...
This would not work for the packages. How would you represent such a
dependency line in a package?
That's why you do slave port with an option toggled, when you need a
package you can depend on. OPTIONS haven't changed this aspect.
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
<pav at FreeBSD.org>
Orfax's hip flask contained Old Janx Spirit, a mixture of potions of
stupidity, paralysis, naivery, ruination, lose memories, confusion, and
slime mold juice, with a twist of lemon. - from a post on Angband
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20071222/c9f5739a/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports