TeTeX and TeXLive
uspoerlein at gmail.com
Wed Dec 19 13:25:58 PST 2007
On Sun, 16.12.2007 at 22:59:55 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> This is a progress report from the current teTeX maintainer who is
> trying to update TeX in the ports tree to TeXLive. As I explained,
> if we go with the finer-grained package model, over 1000 ports have
> to be added at a time, so testing them should be done in a separate
> tree at least. I hope I will be able to set up a public tree for
> testing and collaborative work this month...
> Any comments are welcome. Thanks.
As I'm not doing any work, my vote doesn't count, but please: Creating
2-3 *big* TeXLive ports is certainly wrong, but creating 1000 tiny ports
is equally wrong. Think about the repo bloat and churn introduced by a
"single" software like a LaTeX system. It will slow down everything from
cvs checkout, to index building and pkg_info(1).
Can't you split the TeXLive Distribution up into say 12 ports? Something
minimal that can be used by other ports to typeset documentation (how
common is this, anyway?) and 3-4 big TeXLive ports for the typical TeX
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool,
than to speak, and remove all doubt.
More information about the freebsd-ports