ports.conf: Is there a reason behind not being default?
Xin LI
delphij at delphij.net
Mon Dec 17 17:54:23 PST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I think that ports-mgmt/portconf (a.k.a. /usr/local/etc/ports.conf) is a
very handy feature that makes it much easier to store port options
across upgrade. Is there a reason behind not making it into
bsd.ports.mk? IMHO it's a big deal to take the script into
ports/Tools/scripts, and move the configuration to somewhere like
/etc/ports.conf...
Cheers,
- --
Xin LI <delphij at delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHZyg8hcUczkLqiksRAp8HAKC4eFI+0W1h5uXmQMxNpmoXxLk5/ACfQa56
ooRIdsd0UZz3NoDTiV4iNsY=
=lVUX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list