what's the difference between devel/cvsps and devel/cvsps-devel?

[Stefan Sperling]

Well, not much it seems... except that the cvsps-devel port has not
been updated since 2005.

It looks like the cvsps-devel port is redundant.
Should I file a PR?

Here's a diff between the two:


diff -urN cvsps/CVS/Entries cvsps-devel/CVS/Entries
--- cvsps/CVS/Entries	Fri Oct 12 13:39:25 2007
+++ cvsps-devel/CVS/Entries	Fri Oct 12 13:39:25 2007
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/Makefile/1.9/Tue Mar 27 22:11:53 2007//
-/distinfo/1.6/Sat Aug 12 03:57:38 2006//
+/Makefile/1.11/Sun Jul 31 04:28:50 2005//
+/distinfo/1.7/Thu Nov 24 15:39:10 2005//
 /pkg-descr/1.1/Sat Feb  9 09:38:49 2002//
 D/files////
diff -urN cvsps/CVS/Repository cvsps-devel/CVS/Repository
--- cvsps/CVS/Repository	Fri Oct 12 13:39:25 2007
+++ cvsps-devel/CVS/Repository	Fri Oct 12 13:39:25 2007
@@ -1 +1 @@
-ports/devel/cvsps
+ports/devel/cvsps-devel
diff -urN cvsps/Makefile cvsps-devel/Makefile
--- cvsps/Makefile	Wed Mar 28 00:11:53 2007
+++ cvsps-devel/Makefile	Sun Jul 31 06:28:50 2005
@@ -3,35 +3,27 @@
 # Date Created:			Feb 9, 2002
 # Whom:				ijliao
 #
-# $FreeBSD: ports/devel/cvsps/Makefile,v 1.9 2007/03/27 22:11:53 stas Exp $
+# $FreeBSD: ports/devel/cvsps-devel/Makefile,v 1.11 2005/07/31 04:28:50 nork Exp $
 #
 
 PORTNAME=	cvsps
-PORTVERSION=	2.1
-PORTREVISION=	0
+DISTVERSION=	2.1
 CATEGORIES=	devel
 MASTER_SITES=	http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/
+PKGNAMESUFFIX?=	-devel
 
-MAINTAINER=	stas at FreeBSD.org
-COMMENT=	Create patchset information from CVS
+MAINTAINER=	ports at FreeBSD.org
+COMMENT=	CVS patchsets
+
+CONFLICTS=	cvsps-1.*
 
 USE_GMAKE=	yes
-ALL_TARGET=	cvsps
 
 MAN1=		cvsps.1
 PLIST_FILES=	bin/cvsps
 
-.if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
-PORTDOCS=	README
-.endif
-
 do-install:
 	${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/cvsps ${PREFIX}/bin
 	${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/cvsps.1 ${MANPREFIX}/man/man1
-
-.if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
-	${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR}
-	${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/README ${DOCSDIR}
-.endif
 
 .include <bsd.port.mk>
diff -urN cvsps/files/CVS/Entries cvsps-devel/files/CVS/Entries
--- cvsps/files/CVS/Entries	Fri Oct 12 13:39:25 2007
+++ cvsps-devel/files/CVS/Entries	Fri Oct 12 13:39:25 2007
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-/patch-cvsps.c/1.1/Sat Aug 12 03:57:38 2006//
+/patch-cvsps.c/1.1/Sun Jul 31 04:28:51 2005//
 D
diff -urN cvsps/files/CVS/Repository cvsps-devel/files/CVS/Repository
--- cvsps/files/CVS/Repository	Fri Oct 12 13:39:25 2007
+++ cvsps-devel/files/CVS/Repository	Fri Oct 12 13:39:25 2007
@@ -1 +1 @@
-ports/devel/cvsps/files
+ports/devel/cvsps-devel/files
diff -urN cvsps/files/patch-cvsps.c cvsps-devel/files/patch-cvsps.c
--- cvsps/files/patch-cvsps.c	Sat Aug 12 05:57:38 2006
+++ cvsps-devel/files/patch-cvsps.c	Sun Jul 31 06:28:51 2005
@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
---- cvsps.c.orig	Wed Aug  9 21:59:54 2006
-+++ cvsps.c	Wed Aug  9 22:00:17 2006
-@@ -2551,8 +2551,8 @@
+--- cvsps.c.orig	Sun Jul 31 13:23:28 2005
++++ cvsps.c	Sun Jul 31 13:23:36 2005
+@@ -2550,9 +2550,9 @@
+ 
      for (next = ps->members.next; next != &ps->members; next = next->next) 
      {
++	int d1, d2;
  	PatchSetMember * psm = list_entry(next, PatchSetMember, link);
--	rev = psm->pre_rev;
- 	int d1, d2;
-+	rev = psm->pre_rev;
+ 	rev = psm->pre_rev;
+-	int d1, d2;
  
  	/* the reason this is at all complicated has to do with a 
  	 * branch off of a branch.  it is possible (and indeed 



-- 
stefan
http://stsp.name                                         PGP Key: 0xF59D25F0
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20071213/4b2672aa/attachment-0001.pgp