duration of the ports freeze
Aryeh M. Friedman
aryeh.friedman at gmail.com
Sat Dec 1 07:41:56 PST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>
> I do not think we need a compromise we need a different system. We
> need one that preserves continuity of support for existing systems
> while the new releases are testedin a way that does not adversely
> impact them. The priority needs to be the current user base not a
> desire to rush a new release out the door at all costs.
Over the last few days I have read a very good book that sheds a lot
of light on this "Beyond Software Architecture" by Luke Huffman
(Addison Wesley, 2003, ISBN: 0-201-77954-8) [I am sure it is somewhere
on the p2p nets]. His thesis is that there are two side by side
architectures both of which must be in sync for a really good
solution. There is the technical and the marketing architectures.
Disclaimer he a decidedly MS/mass market view.
The port freeze might make a lot of sense from the technical
architecture but it makes horrible sense from the marketing. I think
the FreeBSD community would do well to consider his main points in any
major redo of the current standard way of doing things.
- --
Aryeh M. Friedman
FloSoft Systems
Developer, not business, friendly
http://www.flosoft-systems.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHUYC/358R5LPuPvsRAjlUAKCd4qW1hTfT+qdVnFDOzfaWZXKmPgCdExrK
op4PIZTRj34SkyhSTfcTUiY=
=VHoy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list