Weird problem with shells/scponly

Yuri Pankov yuri at darklight.org.ru
Fri Aug 24 12:14:33 PDT 2007


On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 01:59:10PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Friday, August 24, 2007 21:24:37 +0400 Yuri Pankov 
> <yuri at darklight.org.ru> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:13:16PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>>> I just encountered a very strange problem with shells/scponly.  When I
>>> tried to portupgrade it, I consistently got an error:
>>>
>>> /usr/ports/shells/scponly]# portupgrade scponly*
>>> --->  Upgrading 'scponly-4.6_1' to 'scponly-4.6_2' (shells/scponly)
>>> --->  Building '/usr/ports/shells/scponly' with make flags:
>>> WITH_SCPONLY_WINSCP
>>> make: don't know how to make WITH_SCPONLY_WINSCP. Stop
>>> ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
>>>        ! shells/scponly (scponly-4.6_1)        (clean error)
>>> --->  Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed
>>>
>>> That option wasn't selected and isn't selected by default.  I tried make
>>> rmconfig/make config, and all the other tricks I know, including make
>>> distclean/portupgrade scponly*.
>>>
>>> Finally I deinstalled the port and reinstalled it.  It installs fine
>>> both  with and without that knob.
>>>
>>> Is portupgrade saving some setting somewhere that is different from
>>> config?
>>>
>>> (I've cc'd the port maintainer although it doesn't look like there's a
>>> problem with the port itself.)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Paul Schmehl (pauls at utdallas.edu)
>>> Senior Information Security Analyst
>>> The University of Texas at Dallas
>>> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
>>
>> It's only a make flag and is passed to make as it is. You need to define
>> it using -DWITH_SCPONLY_WINSCP or by assigning some value to it:
>> WITH_SCPONLY_WINSCP=yes. In your case it was treated as make target,
>> hence error message.
>>
> Yes, but the point is, I *wasn't* trying to build with that flag *and* it 
> wasn't *supposed* to build with that flag.  Yet it was trying to (and 
> failing) anyway.  The default value of the OPTION is "off", and I didn't 
> turn it on.
>
> Very odd.
>
> -- 
> Paul Schmehl (pauls at utdallas.edu)
> Senior Information Security Analyst
> The University of Texas at Dallas
> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

Sorry if I misunderstood you.. It obviously comes from portupgrade, have you
checked MAKE_ARGS hash in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf (or your environment for
PORTUPGRADE variable) defining this flag?


Yuri


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list