graphics/tiff port

Daniel Lucq daniel at scanit.be
Tue Nov 14 11:20:59 PST 2006


Doug Barton wrote:

> First off, you're likely to get a better response if you cc the
> maintainer of the port, which I've done for you.

Of course, my apologies.

> Second, what were the results of your testing the library built
> without libcompat?

graphics/tiff has the following patch applied against it:

diff -u -r1.61 Makefile
--- Makefile	8 Apr 2006 20:22:41 -0000	1.61
+++ Makefile	14 Nov 2006 19:12:48 -000
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
  CONFIGURE_TARGET=
  CONFIGURE_ARGS+=	--with-jpeg-include-dir=${LOCALBASE}/include \
  			--with-jpeg-lib-dir=${LOCALBASE}/lib
-LDFLAGS+=	-lcompat
  CONFIGURE_ENV+=	LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}"

  .if defined(WITH_X11) && !defined(WITHOUT_X11)


graphics/tiff (3.8.2) builds and installs with this patch without any 
problems.

Furthermore, I've built and installed the following:
sane-backends-1.0.18
sane-frontends-1.0.14_2
xsane-0.991_1
gimp-2.2.13_1,1

which all depend in some way on graphics/tiff, without any problems. 
With this newly built software, I've created and manipulated TIFF files 
without problems (e.g. generated using xsane, opened and edited using GIMP).

So for me, everything seems to work fine with the applied diff. For what 
it's worth, the system is a FreeBSD 6.1/i386.


Regards,
Daniel


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list