Reason for 11 or 1.1 appended to SDL files?

[Oliver Lehmann]

Dmitry Marakasov wrote:

> I wonder what is the reason SDL has it's version appended everywhere
> (include/SDL11 instead of include/SDL, libSDL-1.1.so instead of
> libSDL.so, sdl11-config instead of sdl-config). It takes extra time when
> porting SDL software, extra patches need to be added. Is there any good
> reason for such changes to sdl' file names?

Once we had SDL 1.0 in the tree too and this was done to avoid conflicts
between both versions.


-- 
 Oliver Lehmann
  http://www.pofo.de/
  http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/