problems with heimdal

[Kris Kennaway]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 10:51:27AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:44:51 -0500 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 09:40:52AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:10:54 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:19:18 +0300
> > > > Boris Samorodov <bsam at ipt.ru> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > 2. System kerberos libraries doesn't have information about linked
> > > > >    libraries (look at output of "ldd /usr/lib/libgssapi.so"). Thus
> > > > >    we have some trouble (modern mozilla's applications, recall
> > > > >    problems with postgesql port and for sure there are some more).
> > > 
> > > > The maintainer of the in-tree kerberos stuff said it's a problem of the
> > > > application then (in the discussion of the postgresql problem). Did you
> > > > tried to talk with him?
> > > 
> > > No. It seems to me that non-storing information about linked libraries
> > > is not a standard way (what other applications do it?). Hence, the
> > > maintainer have had a serious arguments to do so. And I have nothing
> > > to do but look for a warkaround and share it with the community.
> 
> > Actually I think the /usr/lib/libgssapi.so way *is* standard for
> > FreeBSD.  What counterexamples can you find?
> 
> $ ldd /usr/lib/libssh.so
> /usr/lib/libssh.so:

That's another third-party library, so it doesn't really count.

> Looking at "ldd /usr/lib/*.so" gives much more. I thought that others
> (without output) were self-containing.
> 
> Well, I may be wrong about the standard way. Am I?

I think so, and that's the claim others made in this thread too.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20060119/6e5298e8/attachment.bin