portupgrade and gnupg update

[Vasil Dimov]

Hi,

Currently I get this:

% portversion -v gnupg
gnupg-1.4.6_2               <  needs updating (port has 2.0.1)
gnupg-2.0.1                 =  up-to-date with port
%

This is incorrect and is caused by the fact that portupgrade is not
aware that security/gnupg has been moved to security/gnupg1.

If I apply the following patch:

Index: MOVED
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/pcvs/ports/MOVED,v
retrieving revision 1.1225
diff -u -1 -r1.1225 MOVED
--- MOVED	26 Dec 2006 02:41:42 -0000	1.1225
+++ MOVED	27 Dec 2006 09:58:39 -0000
@@ -2617,2 +2617,3 @@
 devel/stlport-icc||2006-12-20|Has expired: does not work with stlport 4.6.2
+security/gnupg|security/gnupg1|2006-12-20|foobar
 security/gnupg-devel|security/gnupg|2006-12-21|gnupg-devel has been released as Gnupg 2.0

I get this:

% portversion -v gnupg
gnupg-1.4.6_2               <  needs updating (port has 1.4.6_3) (=> 'security/gnupg1')
gnupg-2.0.1                 >  succeeds port (port has 1.4.6_3) (=> 'security/gnupg1')
%

which is weird... why does portversion think that gnupg-2.0.1 has
something to do with security/gnupg1?

-- 
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF at dv
%
A: Yes.
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20061227/0703eef6/attachment.pgp