distfile belongs to?

[Scot Hetzel]

On 12/4/06, Wesley Shields <wxs at atarininja.org> wrote:
> > After a cursory exam this looks really great! I'd love to see this, or
> > something like it added ASAP. At minimum the bsd.port.mk patch should
> > definitely be added even if it takes a while for the other stuff to
> > percolate.
> >
> > Doug
>
> I'm fairly certain that the bsd.port.mk patch requires the other one
> (pkg_create will fall over when it encounters the @distfile lines).  I'd
> be happy to send-pr it if nobody objects in a day or two.
>
The bsd.port.mk patch could be changed to:

.if (${OSVERSION} > 602100  && ${OSVERSION} < 700000) || ${OSVERSION} > 700027
PKGDISTFILE= "comment distfile"
.else
PKGDISTFILE="distfile"
.endif
:
:
-	${ECHO_CMD} "@distfle $${file}" >> ${TMPPLIST}; \
+	${ECHO_CMD} "@${PKGDISTFILE} $${file}" >> ${TMPPLIST}; \

This would allow the bsd.port.mk patch be added, without having to
update the pkg_install tools on older systems.

Then the ports tools (portupgrade, portmaster, ..) could be changed to
look for either "@distfile" or "@comment distfile" in the +CONTENTS
file.

I also noticed that the patch to the pkg_info man page is using a
lower case f, instead of an upper case F for the option to show the
distfiles of a given package.

Scot
-- 
DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.