portupgrade

[gareth]

On Sun 2006-12-03 (22:04), Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Let's move this to the correct mailing list (note reply-to)...

sure, the original question then since we've moved lists:

On Mon 2006-12-04 (04:21), gareth wrote:
> hi, portupgrade doesn't seem to be doing anything? this's the session:
>
> # portversion -l "<"
> gnupg                       <
> p5-Compress-Zlib            <
> p5-IO-Socket-SSL            <
> p5-PathTools                <
> portupgrade                 <
> rsync                       <
> spamass-milter              <
> # portupgrade -aF


> What does portversion -l '<' -v say about the old and new versions?

# portversion -l '<' -v
gnupg-1.4.5_1               <  needs updating (port has 1.4.5_2)
p5-Compress-Zlib-1.42       <  needs updating (port has 2.001)
p5-IO-Socket-SSL-1.01       <  needs updating (port has 1.02)
p5-PathTools-3.23           <  needs updating (port has 3.24)
portupgrade-2.1.3.3_1,2     <  needs updating (port has 2.2.2,2)
rsync-2.6.8_2               <  needs updating (port has 2.6.9)
spamass-milter-0.3.1_1      <  needs updating (port has 0.3.1_3)