devel/fam missing boot (rc.d/fam.sh)?
pav at FreeBSD.org
Tue Sep 20 14:11:21 PDT 2005
Clint Olsen píše v út 20. 09. 2005 v 14:05 -0700:
> Thanks for the hint. However, since this was installed as a
> prerequisite for the GNOME operating system (via portinstall), are we
> supposed to examine every dependent package's pkg-message to find out
> what we missed?
> It would seem like you would want it to install it in one form or
> another and allow the user to change it if that's not the preferred
> method. At least in that case you get a working daemon out of the box.
> It seems to jive with spirit of the more automated portinstall method.
When gnome2 port is finished installing, it prints a short message
containing http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/ link. If you go there and click
FAQ, one of the entry deals with FAM and points to that pkg-message.
Yes it's a bit cumbersome.
We (FreeBSE GNOME Team) is hoping to move soon to gamin, an alternative
fam implementation, which works out of the box.
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
<pav at FreeBSD.org>
And now something completely different.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20050920/fd7b1dfc/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports