Unifying WWW: pkg-descr lines for cpan ports

[Sergey Matveychuk]

Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>>    I beg to disagree. I wouldn't be looking for it there. A 3.2.1.1
>>    would be better.
> 
> 
> I don't want to clutter Quick Porting section with such specialized
> info. It's supposed to give you a really quick start to your first port.

You right. 6.4 section is 'Using perl' and question we discuss is for it.

> 
> We can debate if the structuring of PH into Quick Porting and Slow
> Porting, duplicating much of the data of first in the second, is a good
> design.

It's a great design. I still remember I read it for a first time.

> 
> It could be a "Note:".
> 

Agree.

-- 
Sem.