package-depend oddity (was: Re: [ports-i386@pointyhat.freebsd.org: dspampd-2.00.r2 failed on i386 5] )

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:35:22 -0400
Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 12:33:23AM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:26:42 -0400
> > Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 04:17:33PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 05:04:41PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > > Why does it depend on both clamavs ? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > From some dependency..you'd have to trace through to see which
> > > > > one.
> > > > 
> > > > Hmm ... the interactive page below isn't showing it:
> > > > 
> > > > http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portdependencytree.py?category=mail&portname=dspampd
> > > 
> > > Looks like clamav came in with the recent commit to dspam-devel 2
> > > days ago (also by the same maintainer ;-).
> > 
> > 
> > OK, I see it now. So ... I should depend on clam instead of
> > clamav-devel in dspampd to match the defaults from dspam-devel
> > (which will be dspam in a few days)
> > 
> > 
> > - OPTIONS+=       CLAMAV  "Use clamav as antivir module" off
> > - OPTIONS+=       CLAMAV_DEVEL  "Use clamav as antivir module" on
> > + OPTIONS+=       CLAMAV  "Use clamav as antivir module" on
> > + OPTIONS+=       CLAMAV_DEVEL  "Use clamav as antivir module" off
> 
> That would do it.

And as you say, I maintain both ports :) And I was really happy with
this time speed of dspam :( 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=87691



-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"