Change to INDEX format

[Kris Kennaway]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 02:08:33AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # neuhauser at chello.cz / 2004-06-19 13:11:57 +0200:
> > # kris at obsecurity.org / 2004-06-18 19:17:00 -0700:
> > > This patch extends the format of the INDEX file to separately list
> > > FETCH_DEPENDS, EXTRACT_DEPENDS and PATCH_DEPENDS instead of lumping
> > > them all together with BUILD_DEPENDS.
> > 
> >     Do you think this needs to be reflected in the 'search' target in
> >     bsd.port.subdir.mk?
> 
>     I'm updating Mk/bsd.port.subdir.mk to make searching and display
>     of the 11th to 13th field possible, and I have a question: what
>     should happen to the default display? Should the F-deps, E-deps,
>     P-deps fields be displayed by default?

Probably, I guess.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20051017/38ca7f7f/attachment.bin