Please resurrect trafshow v.3!
Jean-Yves Lefort
jylefort at FreeBSD.org
Mon Nov 7 13:18:34 PST 2005
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:24:31 +0200 (EET)
Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry at atlantis.dp.ua> wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:26:45 +0000 (UTC)
> > From: Jean-Yves Lefort <jylefort at FreeBSD.org>
> > Subject: cvs commit: ports/net/trafshow Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
> > pkg-message.nodevfs pkg-plist ports/net/trafshow/files patch-ac
> > patch-af patch-ag patch-ah patch-configure
> >
> > jylefort 2005-11-05 14:26:45 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > net/trafshow Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist
> > Added files:
> > net/trafshow pkg-message.nodevfs
> > Removed files:
> > net/trafshow/files patch-ac patch-af patch-ag patch-ah
> > patch-configure
> > Log:
> > - Update to 5.2.1 [1]
>
> Is it possible to keep old good trafshow v.3 under, say, net/trafshow3? I've
> tried to use trafshow v.5, but I would say that it violates POLA severily:
>
> o It does traffic aggregation by default, and it's impossible to turn it off
> from it's configuration file.
>
> o It converses numbers to "human-readable" form like '42K' which seems
> confusingly less than say '9800' at the first glance, AND it can't be
> turned off!
>
> o Option '-n' turn protocol decoding off. I would say that it's not always
> obvious that protocol 6 = TCP even for advanced trafshow user.
>
> I'm sure I'm not the only one who doesn't like the new design of good
> old trafshow and wants trafshow v.3 to be available.
I think these potential inconveniences are best addressed by patching
trafshow 5, so that users can have the best of both worlds.
--
Jean-Yves Lefort
jylefort at FreeBSD.org
http://lefort.be.eu.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20051107/2eea2f45/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list