Resolve joe/joe-devel ports

[Kevin Day]

A bit of history about the "joe" editor ports...

Around 5 years ago, I took over maintaining the "editors/joe" port.  
2.8 was the most recent version then, and editors/joe hasn't been  
updated since.

A few years after the release of 2.8, 2.9.xx and 3.xx versions of joe  
started appearing on sourceforge.  Joseph Allen (joe's developer) had  
told me that 2.8 was the most recent "official" version of joe. He  
didn't mind the fork, but said that he planned on returning to  
develop the official branch of joe later.

Eventually the 3.xx branches of joe started adding desirable  
features. I didn't want to mess with the official "editors/joe" port,  
since the changes were made on an unofficial fork, and the main  
branch was supposed to start being developed again. So, "editors/joe- 
devel" was created to track the 3.xx fork on Sourceforge.


Fast forward to today, now. Joseph Allen has now joined the  
sourceforge project, and says that the 2.9 and 3.x branches on there  
are now the official versions, and that 2.8 should be phased out.

This is what I'd propose:

Rename editors/joe to editors/joe2  and upgrade it to joe 2.9  (2.9  
is functionally the same as 2.8, but comes with some bug fixes and a  
better install/configure system)
Rename editors/joe-devel to editors/joe and upgrade it to 3.2  (it's  
currently 2 months behind the current version, at 3.1)



I'm the "joe" maintainer, and Pete (cc'ed) is the joe-devel maintainer.


Any thoughts/comments?