[ports-alpha@pointyhat.freebsd.org: sdcc-2.4.0_1 failed on alpha 4]

[Kris Kennaway]

On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 12:19:56AM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Sunday 01 May 2005 22:24, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 02:03:55PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> > > On Saturday 30 April 2005 03:18, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > gmake[2]: Entering directory
> > > > `/work/a/ports/lang/sdcc/work/sdcc/src/hc08'
> > > > cc -O -pipe -mcpu=ev4 -Wall -pipe -ggdb -O -pipe -mcpu=ev4 -Wall
> > > > -pipe -ggdb -O -pipe -mcpu=ev4 -Wall -pipe -ggdb -O -pipe
> > > > -mcpu=ev4 -I.. -I. -I../..  -I../../support/Util  -c -o gen.o
> > > > gen.c
> > > > {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> > > > {standard input}:17754: Error: inappropriate arguments for opcode
> > > > `extbl'
> > > > gmake[2]: *** [gen.o] Error 1
> > > > gmake[2]: Leaving directory
> > > > `/work/a/ports/lang/sdcc/work/sdcc/src/hc08'
> > > > gmake[1]: ***  [hc08/port.a] Error 2
> > > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory
> > > > `/work/a/ports/lang/sdcc/work/sdcc/src' gmake: *** [sdcc-cc]
> > > > Error 2
> > > > *** Error code 2
> > >
> > > Isn't this a compiler/assembler problem?
> >
> > Is that source file pure C, or does it contain alpha asm code that is
> > incorrect or not recognised by gas?
> 
> It is pure C. I couldn't find "extbl" or any inline asm block in any 
> file of the package.

Might be a bug in gcc 2.95 then..it might be possible for you to use a
later version of gcc to compile this package (if it doesn't require
C++ libraries provided by another package)

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20050501/08b8a561/attachment.bin