New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about
maintainers]
Mark Linimon
linimon at lonesome.com
Fri Jul 29 20:57:15 GMT 2005
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:40:11AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Write a script that parses the submit dates. After an agreed upon amount
> of time with no action (6 months? A year?) the PR gets automatically nuked
> and the original submitter gets an email message - Dear John, we're sorry,
> but nothing was done to correct the problem you submitted in prxxxxx.
> (Copy of the original PR attached.) If this problem remains unresolved and
> needs to be resolved, please resubmit under a new PR.
My experience with closing the stale kern/ PRs is that submitters really
hate it when we do this.
The thing I try to encourage people to do is set PRs to feedback and ask
"is this still a problem?" If yes, change it to either open (if there
is something like a patch or suggested solution) or suspended (no solution
is known.) (Of course, if there is no response after some time, it can
be closed with a "feedback timeout".)
Submitters really don't want to hear that we just gave up on a problem
that they obviously took the time to write us about. The impression
they get from something like this is "FreeBSD doesn't care, I'll just
go elsewhere."
I have plenty of experience trying to close old, stale, PRs to back up
this assertion.
(There is also the problem of "some agreed-upon time". As you are no
doubt learning, getting that "agreed-upon" part down is where the
majority of these ideas fall apart. I have uncommitted patches to the
PR handling guidelines about this; uncommitted because I couldn't get
a consensus about it.)
mcl
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list