repocopy lam7 --> lam
brooks at one-eyed-alien.net
Sat Jan 22 12:47:52 PST 2005
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 07:20:35AM -0800, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> According to lam's website:
> "LAM 6.5.9 is not recommended because the LAM source code has seen a lot of
> changes, bug fixes and new features since then. It is still available for
> download only because some vendors still require it."
> They also recommend lam 7.1.1 for all lam/mpi users.
> I've been suggesting to the LAM maintainers that we should repocopy lam to
> lam6, and make lam7 the new lam from now on. I'm not the maintainer of either
> so I probably shouldn't be sending the PR. Just wondering if there are
> objections to this.
I don't think this is likely to be worth the churn. It seems likely
that LAM will be superseded by OpenMPI soon and will fade away.
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20050122/aa5ccc35/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports