repocopy lam7 --> lam

[Brooks Davis]

On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 07:20:35AM -0800, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Hi;
> 
> According to lam's website:
> 
> "LAM 6.5.9 is not recommended because the LAM source code has seen a lot of
> changes, bug fixes and new features since then. It is still available for
> download only because some vendors still require it."
> 
> They also recommend lam 7.1.1 for all lam/mpi users.
> 
> I've been suggesting to the LAM maintainers that we should repocopy lam to
> lam6, and make lam7 the new lam from now on. I'm not the maintainer of either
> so I probably shouldn't be sending the PR. Just wondering if there are
> objections to this.

I don't think this is likely to be worth the churn.  It seems likely
that LAM will be superseded by OpenMPI soon and will fade away.

-- Brooks

-- 
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20050122/aa5ccc35/attachment.bin