Why does everybody switch to dynamic plists?
Jeremy Messenger
mezz7 at cox.net
Fri Jan 21 12:33:33 PST 2005
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:52:02 +0100, Alexander Leidinger
<Alexander at Leidinger.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can someone please tell me why people enjoy to use dynamic plists, even
> when there was a static plist already?
>
> With a dynamic plist:
> - We lose the ability to search for files which aren't installed.
> (useful for users)
> - We lose the ability to determine if a particular port contains what
> we search.
> (useful for users)
> - We lose the ability to check just with grep if two ports install
> conflicting files (in case we get a report of a conflict it's very
> nice to not need to install a port to verify the conflict).
> (useful for users and port developers)
> - We lose the ability to use portlint to check the plist (if the
> maintainer checks the generated one he just can use a static plist).
> BTW.: Does portlint know how to check the embedded plist (the
> Makefile variables)?
> (useful for port developers)
> - We lose the ability to maybe answer support requests without the need
> to install the software.
> (useful for "the frontliners")
This is mofo annoy to me. I depend on plist pretty a lot to search what
file they have and etc, so I can know for conflict, depend on this port
and etc. google doesn't cut to me.
> + We don't need to take care if the plist changes.
> (useful for port developers)
+ smaller or no plist is good for modem connection user.
> I count 1 positive and 5 negative aspects.
>
> If the developer of a port puts the dynamic plist generation into a
> Makefile target instead of inlining it into the build/install process,
> he doesn't needs to put alot more effort into the development process
> (just one "make <generate-the-plist-target>") and gets the benefits of
> static plists too.
>
> Maybe I've overlooked something, but so far I haven't seen a dynamic
> plist which needs to be a dynamic one. So I think at least 99% of our
> dynamic plists don't need to be dynamic.
I, one, who is on your side. Two people wasn't happy with me when I
refused to switch from static to dynamic in games/wesnoth. games/wesnoth
is getting near 3k lines. ;-)
> Bye,
> Alexander.
--
mezz7 at cox.net - mezz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list