Unmaintained ports [was: Re: Unmaintained ports with fetch
mezz7 at cox.net
Mon Feb 14 14:18:30 PST 2005
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:05:12 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
<reso3w83 at verizon.net> wrote:
> On Monday 14 February 2005 02:01 pm, you wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:39:27 +0100, Pav Lucistnik <pav at FreeBSD.org>
>> > Michael C. Shultz píše v po 14. 02. 2005 v 13:24 -0800:
>> >> Mark, I'd love to take over gettext. The way that one is packaged
>> >> has annoyed me for ages. Do I just submit a PR taking over
>> >> maintainership or do I wait until someone gives the ok?
>> > Uhh, how exactly you want to change gettext port?
> I intend to eliminate it running configure in all the subdirectories.
I think, this part should be contract to the gettext developers. Unless,
you mean by you dislike the 'LIBTOOLFILES' then this is need for the
libtool. I don't see how it can be annoy for anyone as long it installs
and functions fine.
>> > It's one of the core ports, ports such important even no brave
>> > knight of the round table ever dare to claim maintainership on it
> Chickens ;)
>> > ...
>> I agree.
> Well I think I can handle it and I will happily submit changes to
> anyone who wants to see them for themselves before hand.
Please, go ahead and portmgr will taking a look at it because it might
required to be test in the cluster build.
mezz7 at cox.net - mezz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org
More information about the freebsd-ports