SHA256 checksum in ports
Kris Kennaway
kris at obsecurity.org
Sun Dec 18 10:28:04 PST 2005
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:12:22PM +0300, Igor Pokrovsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone knows what was the reason to add SHA256 checksum check
> in ports? Why MD5 was insufficient?
Enough progress has been made towards breaking MD5 that it is no
longer considered safe to rely on for these purposes.
Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20051218/970e1aac/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list