ports/www is too full

[Frank Laszlo]

Edwin Groothuis wrote:

>Ports/www is too full: 755 ports.
>
>I have kind of sorted (partly brute-force, partly eye-work) and
>came up with the attached splits:
>
>	www-servers		 48
>	www-servers-modules	115
>	www-proxy		 27
>
>	www-browsers		 77
>
>	www-apps		 26
>	www-apps-cms		 24
>	www-apps-images		 13
>	www-apps-rss		  9
>	www-apps-wiki		 21
>	www-apps-zope		 41
>
>	www-devel		 11
>	www-devel-perl		176
>	www-devel-php		 19
>	www-devel-python	 12
>	www-devel-ruby  	 11
>
>	www-editors   		 29
>	www-log			 27
>	www-ml			 17
>	www-spiders		 25
>
>	www-misc		 19
>
>	www			  0
>
>I'm missing 8 ports somewhere, but the idea is there.
>Of course these categories aren't written in stone and I'm not going
>to defend them regiously[sp], but it gives an idea what is there.
>
>Maybe even splitting pf www-servers*, www-clients and www-proxy
>
>I am willing to volunteer for this job, but I think it's more the
>cvsmeisters which will curse than I am.
>
>Comments? Remarks? Support? Ideas? Hostile takeovers?
>
>Edwin
>
>  
>
This sounds like a good idea to me, But I dont know if it should be 
broken down to such an extreme. Maybe just break up the "big ones" and 
create a www-misc for everything else. Just my 2 cents.

Regards,
    Frank