alternative options for ports

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Saturday 16 October 2004 10:19, David O'Brien wrote:

>I think our slave
> ports is a fine solution issues like this.

Full ack. A one to one mapping of portdir<->package is always preferrable to 
some obfuscated logic and Makefile spaghetti code that just magically 
produces more than one package from one port.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20041016/f3c85ab1/attachment.bin