alternative options for ports
michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Sat Oct 16 04:31:21 PDT 2004
On Saturday 16 October 2004 03:50, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> I don't know what Debian does or does not do, but I don't need to know
> that to tell you again that adding a million slave-ports is not
> realistic and that anybody who seriously suggests that must be out of
> his or her mind. (Yes, I did mean "a million extra slave-ports"
> literally, and was not employing hyperbole.)
I have no idea how you're arriving at the number of a million slave ports. I
have no idea how you could think I was suggesting adding a million slave
ports (however one would achieve that, I have no idea) either.
> (Hint: Currently there on the order of 10000 ports. Adding a million
> extra ports would increase the size of the ports collection
> hundredfold, and the package building would probably not be able to
> finish until it is time to start over again for the next release.
> That million slave-ports is just what would be needed for
That's utter nonsense. The easiest way of providing a good package for a port
is: Turn as many optional features/build-switches on by default. In some
cases, turning something on isn't desirable because it adds too many
dependencies to a package which people would not usually want. For _those_
cases, it is a good idea to investigate if slave ports can be made so the
features are available to package users immediately. If that's not possible,
tough luck - at least for the moment, because a good port maintainer would
then go and try to nudge upstream development into making the application
modular enough to make it possible in the future.
> I view the building from source as the primary purpose of the ports
> system, with the creation of binary packages as just a nice bonus.
With all due respect for your view, but that's just not true.
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi at freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20041016/d8dff033/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports