portupgrade and daemons.
kay_lehmann at web.de
Sun May 23 06:15:35 PDT 2004
Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:52:06PM +0200, Kay Lehmann wrote:
>>As far as I know this isn't the job of portupgrade. Normally it should
>>be handeled by the port itself, which could stop daemons with
>>appropriate set (de)install targets.
>>I think a lot of the ports do this quite properly. Moving this to Mk
>>looks quite complicated and I think it would be the best to leave it in
>>the ports, since they should know what is required to do.
> Ah ok. That makes sense. Do you know of a port that does this properly
> off the top of your head?
I think cups-base has some code.
More information about the freebsd-ports