Suggestion about removing old ports ftp/lukemftp and ftp/lukemftpd
cejkar at fit.vutbr.cz
Mon May 17 06:22:06 PDT 2004
what do you think about removing old ports ftp/lukemftp and ftp/lukemftpd?
lukemftp/lukemftpd have been renamed to tnftp/tnftpd in the past and the
old ports lukemftp/lukemftpd seems to be more and more obsolete, whereas
the same programs under new names tnftp/tnftpd are maintained.
- Obsolete ftp/lukemftp:
Maintainer is jedgar at FreeBSD.org (sending Cc), version is ftp-1.5.tar.gz
from Oct 11 2000 before renaming. Distfile is not fetchable from master
+ New ftp/tnftp:
Maintainer is tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org, version is tnftp-20030825.tar.gz
from Aug 25 2003, which is direct successor instead of lukemftp.
You can see PR ports/62373 New port: ftp/tnftp NetBSD ftp
client - obsoletes lukemftp
- Obsolete ftp/lukemftpd:
There is no maintainer (ports at FreeBSD.org) and version is
lukemftpd-1.1.tar.gz from May 9 2001 before renaming. Distfile has been
+ New ftp/tnftpd:
Maintained by me (cejkar at fit.vutbr.cz) and version is
tnftpd-20031217.tar.gz from Dec 18 2003, which is direct successor
instead of lukemftpd.
Rudolf Cejka <cejkar at fit.vutbr.cz> http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar
Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology
Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic
More information about the freebsd-ports