USE_QT_VER after including bsd.port.pre.mk?
michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Mon May 3 08:51:05 PDT 2004
On Monday 03 May 2004 17:43, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > So why was portlint changed prematurely? Surely confusing port
> > maintainers serves no purpose?
> It wasn't changed prematurely. You have to specify USE_QT_VER *before*
> including bsd.port.pre.mk, using OPTIONS or not.
No, you don't. I've been sucessfully using USE_QT_VER in security/pinentry
*after* <bsd.port.pre.mk> for a long time.
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi at freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040503/ca09edae/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports