USE_QT_VER after including bsd.port.pre.mk?

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Monday 03 May 2004 17:43, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> Michael Nottebrock wrote:

> > So why was portlint changed prematurely? Surely confusing port
> > maintainers serves no purpose?
>
> It wasn't changed prematurely. You have to specify USE_QT_VER *before*
> including bsd.port.pre.mk, using OPTIONS or not. 

No, you don't. I've been sucessfully using USE_QT_VER in security/pinentry 
*after* <bsd.port.pre.mk> for a long time.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040503/ca09edae/attachment.bin