INDEX vs. INDEX-5

[Adam Weinberger]

>> (03.14.2004 @ 2156 PST): Robin Schoonover said, in 1.0K: <<
> On 14 Mar 2004 21:40:08 -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > >> (03.11.2004 @ 2050 PST): Sergey Matveychuk said, in 0.4K: <<
> > > May be the question is silly but why we have both INDEX and INDEX-5?
> > > 
> > > I've found no ways to place 5.x-only port into INDEX-5.
> > > 
> > > What is difference to build INDEX on 4.x machine and INDEX-5 on 5.x?
> > > The ports tree is the same anyway.
> > > 
> > 
> > Check the archives. This was answered less than a week ago.
> > 
> 
> And the question was asked by the same person (with the same message,
> but different message ids and different dates).  Apparently the OP
> has some weird duplication issues going on.
>> end of "Re: INDEX vs. INDEX-5" from Robin Schoonover <<

Aack! That'll teach me to check archives before posting ::P

# Adam


--
Adam Weinberger
adamw at gnome.org  \\oo//  adamw at FreeBSD.org
adamw at vectors.cx  \\// adamw at magnesium.net
http://www.vectors.cx