A question about dependencies
mezz7 at cox.net
Tue Jun 29 09:37:37 PDT 2004
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:17:09 +0200, Michael Nottebrock
<michaelnottebrock at gmx.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 June 2004 10:14, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:43:02PM -0600, Bob Melson wrote:
>> > Briefly, I discovered on my system some 124 ports of 600+ that show
>> > python as a requirement. Granted that many are probably cascading
>> > requirements: A requires B which requires C which requires python,
>> so A
>> > and B are shown to depend on it; this still seems to me to be a
>> Actually, there are just two ports that directly depend on python, and
>> through which the majority of those other ports you mention inherit
>> their python dependence. Those ports are:
>> both of which are important parts of the Gnome environment.
>> If you don't want python installed on your system, then there's a
>> simple solution. Set 'WITHOUT_PYTHON=yes' in /etc/make.conf and
>> reinstall all of the ports that depend from those two.
> In the special case of python, I would agree that there are unnecessary
> dependencies recorded - it seems libxml and libxslt do not have a runtime
> dependency on python, just a buildtime dependency to build python
> However, USE_PYTHON can either record both run & buildtime dependencies
> - perhaps another knob is needed here. Comments?
It will install the *.py files if Python enable, so I disagree with this.
But, I don't understand what you mean by 'perhaps another knob is needed
here'. WITHOUT_PYTHON knob isn't good enough?
mezz7 at cox.net - mezz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org
More information about the freebsd-ports