Is someone working on upgrading mail/dspam to version 3.0.0?

[Julien Gabel]

Thanks for your quick answer.

I don't know if i am able to produce any patches for this port, but
i will give it a try as soon as possible... and we will see... :)

Thanks a lot,
--
-jpeg.

>> As i am *very interesting* to use the new stable 3.0.0 of mail/dspam
>> (i encountered some problem with the actual version in port and want
>> to try some new features of the latest release), i just ask if someone
>> is working on upgrading this port.
>>
>> I am aware of the past threads on this particular port, and understand
>> that it is not an easy point, so..

> I've posted this a few days ago on dspam-users mailing list;
> unfortunately I didn't have the time o polish the port (see below), but
> it works.
>
> From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu at apropo.ro>
> To: dspam-users at nuclearelephant.com
> Cc: dspam-dev at nuclearelephant.com
> Subject: dspam 3.0 FreeBSD port (was: Re: [dspam-users] DSPAM v3.0.0
> Released)
> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:25:33 +0300
>
>  On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:37:47 -0400
>  "Jonathan A. Zdziarski" <jonathan at nuclearelephant.com> wrote:
>
>  > RELEASE 3.0.0-STABLE
>  >
>  >
>  > Version 3.0.0-STABLE is a stable release. Any bugs should be reported
> to the
>  > development mailing list.
>
>  If you feel adventurous and you don't wanna wait despite the warnings
>  below, go ahead ( and send patches ;-) ) :
>
>  > From: Rob Evers <rob at debank.tv>
>  > To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu at apropo.ro>
>  > Subject: Re: dspam 3.0 port
>  > Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:55:11 +0200
>  >
>  >  Hi Ion-Mihai,
>  >
>  >  Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>  >  > Hi,
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > I've had an very nasty real-life time so my progresses in the
>  >  > dpsma-devel port aren't as good as I've hoped.
>  >  >
>  >  Hope it gets better soon.
>  >
>  >  > Anyway, I have a working version of the port at:
>
>  http://www.people.tecnik93.com/~itetcu/dspam-devel/dspam-devel-3.0.0/
>
>  >  >
>  >  > It lack a little polishing, credits, supplementary documentation,
> etc.
>  >  > Oracle does not configure and the CGI part is a complete mess as I
>  >  > haven't time to test it at all.
>  >  >
>  >  > But AFAIK it works (mysql, postfix tested) and it doesn't even break
> the
>  >  > INDEX generation :)
>  >  >
>  >  > I also have a mysql converting script for the 2.x to 3.x db, which
> need
>  >  > a little more work on the user interface.
>  >  >
>  >  > As the 3.x is due to come out on Monday I thought you might want to
> use
>  >  > it for the update. I would suggest trimming down this port for the
> dspam
>  >  > port and use the -devel port as a testing ground in the future.
>  >  >
>  >
>  >  Thank you for the work done, I'll try to find the time this week to do
>  >  the update (when 3.0.0 stable is out).
>  >
>  >  Rob Evers.

-- 
-jpeg.