configuring ports via Makefile.local
michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Fri Jul 30 12:57:37 PDT 2004
On Friday 30 July 2004 21:55, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Friday 30 July 2004 21:40, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> > But since you
> > would have to put the options in make.conf anyway to make them work with
> > portinstall, what's the point of OPTIONS then?
> You wouldn't. The point of OPTIONS is exactly to unclutter your make.conf
> (and advertising available switches). Of course you need to set them
> interactively at least once (just like you need to edit make.conf at least
> once if you'd rather avoid using OPTIONS).
Forgot to add: Optionally setting OPTIONS ahead of all the compiling is a
feature of OPTIONSNG, IIRC.
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi at freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040730/194945f5/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports