localpkg script changes
Oliver Eikemeier
eikemeier at fillmore-labs.com
Wed Jul 14 04:07:31 PDT 2004
Mike Makonnen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was looking at integrating ports rc.d scripts a bit better, and the
> following is
> what I came up with. I would appreciate reviews, tests, etc..
[...]
> Ports related rc.d cleanups:
> [...]
> o The rc.d ports scripts should now behave more like base system
> scripts.
> Scripts ending in .sh will be sourced into the current shell, while
> the
> rest will be executed in a subshell. Previously, all ports scripts,
> regardless of the .sh suffix, were executed in a subshell.
You can't do this, since it might break too many ports. See PR 56736 for
an alternate approach.
Follow-up to ports@, where this discussion belongs to. See
<http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040713140354.GA1695@rogue.acs-
et.com>
for the original message.
-Oliver
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list