[kris@FreeBSD.org: cvs commit: ports/lang/nawk Makefile]
Hiroki Sato
hrs at FreeBSD.org
Wed Feb 25 11:10:06 PST 2004
horio shoichi <bugsgrief at bugsgrief.net> wrote
in <20040224.235412.e05ccefc82735f8f.10.0.3.9 at bugsgrief.net>:
bugsgrief> Marking BROKEN against this sort of trouble makes the retrieval
bugsgrief> of the newer ones difficult. Better turn it off ?
Simply updating the port solves the problem, doesn't it? I cannot
understand what you are trying to say, honestly speaking. If a distfile
that includes no version number in its filename is used, the port
should be updated when the distfile is updated. Or, the maintainer can
separately prepare the distfile whose filename includes its version
number by himself. Anyway, I think the problem is not due to the ports
infrastructure itself.
--
| Hiroki SATO
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040226/957655db/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list