distfile for lang/ifc
NAKATA Maho
chat95 at mac.com
Thu Dec 16 23:27:39 PST 2004
In Message-ID: <41B8DCD3.1080009 at math.missouri.edu>
Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen at math.missouri.edu> wrote:
Dear Stephen
How are you doing?
> 1. Is it likely that lang/ifc will be updated soon?
Yes. updated today.
> 2. Or is it possible to get hold of l_fc_pc_8.0.046.tar.gz and
> l_fc_pc_8.0.046_pe050.1.tar.gz from somewhere, and if so, will the
> non-commercial license that Intel sent me still work on this older version?
Go to https://premier.intel.com/
you must be a resgtered user (no fee)
> 3. Or if I were to try to update the port myself, would a simple
> substitution of distfiles and a few other things in the Makefile do the job?
Might be.
> I did a search on the mailing list of ports, and I saw some kind of
> discussion - maybe lseek doesn't work quite right or something. But my
lseek issue was fixed by myself before.
> applications will be doing numerical calculations, and so if an lseek
> here or there doesn't work quite right, I can live with this. Anyway,
> all this discussion seemed to take place in April or May, and I wonder
> if people are still thinking about it?
So, no :)
> P.S. The lang/icc port seems to work great, and for computationally
> intensive calculations seems to be faster than the gcc that comes with
> FreeBSD 5.3.
This is not my port :) but I think netchild is wonderful committer.
Thank you very much for your e-mail and suggestion.
-- NAKATA, Maho
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list