michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Mon Aug 2 14:24:58 PDT 2004
On Monday 02 August 2004 23:03, Kent Stewart wrote:
> > See my other reply... perhaps a portupgrade -rf fam\* is even safer.
> > Perhaps also a note in /usr/ports/UPDATING is in order.
> I am trying that right now. I had done basically a -pufr fam when I got
> into trouble building kdelibs and kdebase on 5-current. When I hit a
> wall on 5-current, I tried it on 4-stable with equally bad results.
> The enviroment was a little muddled and I have rebuilt latest fam and
> building kdelibs right now. It takes a little time to do that :).
Also make sure to delete the now orphaned /usr/local/lib/libfam.la before you
begin the portupgrade.
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi at freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040802/577e4e5b/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports