ports and DESTDIR (was: Second "RFC" on pkg-data idea for
ports)
Garance A Drosihn
drosih at rpi.edu
Wed Apr 14 13:03:05 PDT 2004
At 9:06 PM +0200 4/14/04, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:13:11 +0200
>Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh at schweikhardt.net> wrote:
>
>> For starters: one real BIG problem (at least for me) the ports system
>> still has is a lack of DESTDIR support. We can
>>
>> make installkernel DESTDIR=/foo
>> make installworld DESTDIR=/foo
>>
>> but try this with ports and let all hope go. There is even a PR in the
>> queue that solves some issues, but it has been left to rot for years,
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/28155
>
>I fail to see how you want to solve the DESTDIR= issue for
>every installation procedure we have in the ports tree. You
>have to convince every autoconf, automake, custom made, what
>ever "makefile" to respect DESTDIR in his "make install" target.
Another complication is that many ports include cross-references
to themselves or other programs "on the system". If you install
to /otherhost/usr/local/bin, then those ports will embed that
installation path in the files they install. When you then
run it on the other system, it references /other/usr/local
instead of the /usr/local that you want it to use.
I know I have been bitten by this on some occasions, although I
can't think of a specific example right now...
>For 10.000 ports this is a lot of work. Any idea how to solve
>this problem?
I have wondered if something could be done with chroot, but I
have not tried to figure out the details...
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad at gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer or gad at freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih at rpi.edu
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list