Second "RFC" on pkg-data idea for ports
kris at obsecurity.org
Mon Apr 12 22:49:47 PDT 2004
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 01:18:07PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 12:23:31PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >>It would be real helpfull to users if the package or port system would
> >>be able to automatically overcome this problem with installing the
> >>needed version in a way that the installed versions stays intact.
> >Take a look at the portupgrade port, I think that's what you're trying
> >to describe.
> If I understood portupgrade right, it upgrade a port but it still does
> not allow to keep the old version in parallel allowing one application
> using the old one while the other application uses the new one.
> >>This could lead to a general system where any number of different
> >>versions of a package or port could be installed on the machine without
> >>any interferance.
> >That's a very different problem.
> But it is what I ment.
That's off-topic for the present discussion then, because Garance
wasn't asking for blue-sky wishlists of features for the ports tree,
he was asking for comments on his specific proposal.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040412/7dddec31/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports